by Jace A. Derwin, CSCS, RSCC
NSCA Coach May 2019
Vol 5, Issue 4
Preparation of the American football athlete requires the development of a wide array of physical qualities. Strength, muscular size, and speed all play important roles within the domain of the game. The expansion of bioenergetic efficiency within competition is equally important when it comes to the preparatory needs of the football athlete. Strength and conditioning plans devoid of specific and logical energy system development may not provide the appropriate stimulus to prepare athletes for competition. This article is intended to provide an understanding of the demands of the game from a bioenergetic perspective and provides a framework in which strength and conditioning professionals can design conditioning plans that focus on preparing athletes for competition.
This article originally appeared in NSCA Coach, a quarterly publication for NSCA Members that provides valuable takeaways for every level of strength and conditioning coach. You can find scientifically based articles specific to a wide variety of your athletes’ needs with Nutrition, Programming, and Youth columns. Read more articles from NSCA Coach »
1. Barbero-Álvarez, JC, Coutts, A, Granda, J, Barbero-Álvarez, V, and Castagna, C. The validity and reliability of a global positioning satellite system device to assess speed and repeated sprint ability (RSA) in athletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 13(2): 232-235, 2010.
2. Baechle, TR, Earle, RW, and Wathen, D Anaerobic exercise prescription. In: Baechle, T, and Earle, R (Eds.), Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. (3rd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 379, 2008.
3. Bishop, D, Edge, J, and Goodman, C. Muscle buffer capacity and aerobic fitness are associated with repeated-sprint ability in women. European Journal of Applied Physiology 92(45): 540-547, 2004.
4. Cramer, JT. Bioenergetics of exercise and training. In: Baechle, T, and Earle, R (Eds.), Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. (3rd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 22-39, 2008.
5. Gazzano, F, and Gabbett, T. A Practical guide to workload management and injury prevention in college and high school sports. NSCA Coach 4(4): 30-35, 2017.
6. Gist, NH, Freese, EC, and Cureton, KJ. Comparison of responses to two high-intensity intermittent exercise protocols. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 28(11): 3033-3040, 2014.
7. Gharbi, Z, Dardouri, W, Haj-Sassi, R, Chamari, K, and Souissi, N. Aerobic and anaerobic determinants of repeated sprint ability in team sports athletes. Biology of Sport 32(3): 207, 2015.
8. Hoffman, JR. The applied physiology of American football. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 3(3): 387-392, 2008.
9. Hoffman, JR, Im, J, Kang, J, Ratamess, NA, Nioka, S, Rundell, KW, et al. The effect of a competitive collegiate football season on power performance and muscle oxygen recovery kinetics. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 19(3): 509-513, 2005.
10. Hofstetter, MC, Mäder, U, and Wyss, T. Effects of a 7-week outdoor circuit training program on Swiss Army recruits. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 26(12): 341, 2012.
11. Iosia, MF, and Bishop, PA. Analysis of exercise-to-rest ratios during division IA televised football competition. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 22(2): 332-340, 2008.
12. Issurin, V, and Yessis, M. Block Periodization. Michigan: Ultimate Athlete Concepts; 2008.
13. Kin-Isler, A, Ariburun, B, Ozkan, A, Aytar, A, and Tangogan, R. The relationship between anaerobic performance, muscle strength and sprint ability in American football players. Isokinetics and Exercise Science 16(2): 1-6, 2008.
14. Ratamess, NA. Adaptations to anaerobic training programs. In: Baechle, T, and Earle, R (Eds.), Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. (3rd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 94-119, 2008.
15. Rhea, MR, Hunter, RL, and Hunter, TJ. Competition modeling of American football: Observational data and implications for high school, collegiate, and professional player conditioning. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 20(1): 58-61, 2006.
16. Sanders, GJ, Roll, B, and Peacock, CA. Maximum distance and high-speed distance demands by position in NCAA Division I collegiate football games. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 31(10): 2728-2733, 2017.
17. Sanders, GJ, Turner, Z, Boos, B, Peacock, CA, Peveler, W, and Lipping, A. Aerobic capacity is related to repeated sprint ability with sprint distances less than 40 meters. International Journal of Exercise Science 10(2): 197, 2017.
18. Schneider, V, Arnold, B, Martin, K, Bell, D, and Crocker, P. Detraining effects in college football players during the competitive season. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 12: 42-45, 1998.
19. Sousa, AC, Marinho, DA, Gil, MH, Izquierdo, M, RodríguezRosell, D, Neiva, HP, and Marques, MC. Concurrent training followed by detraining: Does the resistance training intensity matter? The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 32(3): 632-642, 2017.
20. Tomlin, DL, and Wenger, HA. The relationship between aerobic fitness and recovery from high intensity intermittent exercise. Sports Medicine 31(1): 1-11, 2001. 21. Wellman, AD, Coad, SC, Goulet, GC, and McLellan, CP. Quantification of competitive game demands of NCAA Division I college football players using global positioning systems. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 30(1): 11-19, 2016.