Notice: The NSCA website is scheduled to undergo system maintenance from 12:00 AM - 2:30 AM EST. During this time, there may be short service interruptions across the site and some parts of the site may not be accessible. We apologize for any inconvenience while we work to improve the website experience and security.

0

Notice: The NSCA website is scheduled to undergo system maintenance from 12:00 AM - 2:30 AM EST. During this time, there may be short service interruptions across the site and some parts of the site may not be accessible. We apologize for any inconvenience while we work to improve the website experience and security.

Using LTAD to Program for a Middle School Athlete and a High School Athlete: Part 2 – Creating a Developmentally-Appropriate Strength and Conditioning Program

by Rick Howard, MEd, CSCS, *D
NSCA Coach January 2019
Vol 3, Issue 5

Share:

This second article of a two-part series continues the discussion of long-term athletic development (LTAD). This article provides practical application of the LTAD principles by examining two sample programs.

This article continues the discussion of long-term athletic development (LTAD) by providing a sample program design. Part 1 of this two-part article served to help sports coaches better understand and apply LTAD principles to the development of athletic profiles for their youth athletes based on multiple dimensions of physical maturity (at the youth level, the sports coach often is the strength and conditioning coach) (3). These athletic profiles were divided into two major groups based on peak height velocity (PHV); “the period of time in which an adolescent experiences their fastest upward growth in stature…” (3). As athletes that are pre-PHV (not yet adolescent) have different exercise and movement goals when compared with post-PHV (adolescent) athletes, practical application of LTAD can be complicated. This article provides practical application of the LTAD principles by examining two sample programs. The first program is for a middle school athlete who is pre-peak height velocity (pre-PHV). The second program is for a high school athlete who is post-peak height velocity (post-PHV). Recognizing that coaches are most often faced with an uncertain combination of pre-PHV and post-PHV, the practical application is not always so easy or straightforward for coaches working with young athletes. 

Pre-PHV and Post-PHV Differences in Youth

Coaches should recognize that pre-PHV and post-PHV aspiring athletes will have overlapping, yet different program goals. Pre-PHV should focus on “mastery of fundamental motor skills, sport sampling, general physical preparation, development of muscle strength using a variety of implements, introductory sport skills, physical literacy, attention to volume of training/playing, rest, and nutrition,” (3). This includes locomotor skills, object control skills, and body awareness. The development of fundamental motor skills is also demonstrated by the ability to establish proper athletic positioning via the universal athletic stance, body awareness when shifts in position occur, and development of movement abilities in all three cardinal planes of motion (4). On the other hand, post-PHV youth “may narrow focus to one or two sports but also may continue to sample/play multiple sports, continue focus on general physical preparation with enhanced sport skills, continue to develop muscle strength and power, correctly periodize the volume of training/playing, and pay attention to rest, and nutrition,” (3). The post-PHV athlete should apply strength and skill to the desired sports or activities. These categories lead to the testing that best matches level of maturity, with pre-pubertal youth continuing to focus on improving general athleticism while pubertal youth can apply that athleticism in a sport setting (3).

Example Test Results and Program Design for Pre-PHV Youth Test Results for Pre-PHV Youth

 In accordance with pillar 8 of the National Strength and Conditioning Association’s Position Statement on Long-term Athletic Development, testing is a snapshot of the athlete’s performance on that test or battery of tests on that day only (5). Test results are to be used to establish individual athlete’s strengths and weaknesses, not to predict athletic talent. The example test results for the pre-PHV youth (Table 1) focus on fundamental movements, exercise technique, and generic fitness tests. Note that not all tests have gender-specific data. Testing is designed to be completed in one session but larger numbers of athletes may require testing over two or three initial sessions.

Testing order follows the NSCA testing protocol, where available— motor skill mastery is not included in the NSCA protocol, for example. These tests are samples of tests conducted by the author (1).

“Pre-PHV should focus on ‘mastery of fundamental motor skills, sport sampling, general physical preparation, development of muscle strength using a variety of implements, introductory sport skills, physical literacy, attention to volume of training/playing, rest, and nutrition.’”

Tweet this quote

Program Design for Pre-PHV Youth

Following NSCA principles, trainees with no prior lifting experience are considered training age 0 (1). The pre-PHV athlete in this example is training age 0, so, according to NSCA guidelines this aspiring athlete should begin with resistance training 1 – 2 times per week (1). According to his test results (Table 1), the focus of LTAD training should not only be on all 10 fitness attributes (pillar 2, 3, 6, and 7) but also focusing on improving the fitness attributes with scores below the norm (5). The exercises selected are usually available to coaches and address fundamental movement patterns such as hinging, lunging, and squatting; strength; and overall athleticism. A sample 2 times per week program might look like the following:

Day 1

Motor Warm-up:

Walk-March-Skip progressions (30 s x 2)

Alternate coach pick/athlete pick (the coach and athlete take turns selecting the next exercise, which helps the athlete learn and take responsibility for the exercises and helps the coach by finding which exercises the athlete chooses vs. the exercises the athlete needs in his program)

Sample Alternating Coach/Athlete Exercise Selection:

Coach Pick: 15 lunges (bodyweight)

Athlete Pick: Assault Bike 2 min

Coach Pick: Hip Hinge with Kettlebell (4 kg)

Athlete Pick: Leg Press 0.5 x bodyweight

Coach Pick: Cable Push/Pull unilateral 15 lb/20 lb

Athlete Pick: Game: Gaga

Day 2

Motor Warm-Up:

Obstacle Course: Hopscotch Poly-Spots, Hula Hoop, Cone Zig-Zag, Balance Beam Step and  Stop, Jump Rope (20 s each, 40 s rest)

Circuit Training:

Hip Bridge, Can Openers, Suspension Training Squats, Medicine Ball Lateral Rotations,  Mountain Climbers, Barre Romanian Deadlifts (1 circuit to start)

Example Test Results and Program Design for Post-PHV Youth (Male) Test Results for Post-PHV Youth

For post-PHV youth, test results can be used not only to establish individual athlete’s strengths and weaknesses but also to predict athletic talent. The example test results for the post-PHV youth (Table 2) focus on fundamental movements, exercise technique, and generic fitness tests, similar to pre-PHV youth, and also reveal that this athlete still has not mastered critical fundamental movements and has below standard test results for power, speed, and relative strength. These tests are examples of tests conducted by the author for comparison to testing of PHV youth. Since this athlete needs general fitness and movement remediation, sports relevant testing is not conducted as part of this profile.

Program Design for Post-PHV Youth

The post-PHV athlete in this example is training age 2 which means he has experience with resistance training exercise technique, although it is noted his power development is below standard, so his power exercise progressions need to be regressed. According to NSCA guidelines, this developing athlete should engage in resistance training according to seasonal requirements, i.e., based on whether he is off-season, pre-season, in-season, or post-season (1). However, multisport participation is factored as the focus of LTAD and he has not yet declared a sport in which he chooses to specialize, so training should continue to be on all 10 fitness attributes (pillar 2, 3, 6, and 7) (5). In order to improve his test results in exercises and motor abilities in which he is below the norm (see Table 2), a sample 3 times per week program might look like the following:

Day 1 (Monday)

Power:

  • Triple Extension 5 x 3

Core: 

  • Front Squat 5 x 5
  • Romanian Deadlift 3 x 5
  • Push Press 3 x 5

 Accessory:

  • Glute/Ham Raise 3 x 8
  • Shoulder IYTLs 2 x 8
  • Push-Ups As Many Repetitions As Possible (AMRAP)

Day 2 (Wednesday)

Power:

  • High Shrug Pulls 3 x 3
  • Standing Broad Jumps 3 x 3

 Core:

  • Step-Ups 5 x 5
  • Incline Press 5 x 5
  • Trap Bar Deadlift 5 x 5

Accessory:

  • Pull-Ups AMRAP
  • Lateral Band Walks Light Tubing x 30 s each way

Day 3 (Friday)

Power:

  • Jump Shrugs 3 x 3
  • Vertical Jumps 3 x 5 
  • One-Leg Hops x 10

 Core:

  • Back Squats 5 x 3
  • Landmine One-Arm Press 3 x 5
  • One-Leg RDL 3x 10

Accessory:

  • Pallof Press 2 x 12
  • Medicine Ball Against the Wall 3 x 5
  • Mountain Climbers 30 s x 3

Table 1. Sample Athletic Profile Test Results for Pre-PHV Youth (Male)

FITNESS ATTRIBUTE

EXERCISE/MOVEMENT

ATHLETE SCORE

PRE-PHV NORMS (2)

ABOVE NORM, BELOW NORM, OR MEETS STANDARD

Fundamental Motor Skill Mastery

Fundamental Motor Skill Mastery Checklist (8)

Knee valgus on skipping and landing

Does not meet standard

Below for Skipping and Landing

Proper Athletic Stance

 

Met standard when coached properly

Meets Standard

Meets Standard

Body Awareness

 

Was aware of balance center of gravity and base of support changes

Meets Standard

Meets Standard

Cardinal Planes of Motion

 

Does not move well laterally

Does not meet standard

Below for frontal plane movements

Exercise Technique (1)

Basic Exercise Technique for Foundational Movements such as Squat, Lunge, and Hinge

Needs further coaching and cuing for foundational movement

Meets Standard

Needs further coaching and cuing for foundational movements

Balance (static)

Stork Stand

24 s (boys)

30 s (boys);

20 s (girls)

Below Norm

Agility

Pro-Agility

7.15 s

Not found

Below, especially for movements such as deceleration and reacceleration

Power (horizontal)

Standing Broad Jump

52 in. (boys)

59 in. (boys);

56 in. (girls)

Below Norm

Power (vertical)

Vertical Jump

12 in.

10.5 in. (not gender differentiated)

Slightly above norm

Strength (absolute)

Handgrip Dynamometer

25.5 kg

29.7 kg (11-12 y/o)

Below Norm

Strength (relative)

Pull-Ups/Push-Ups

 

Pull-Ups: 0

Push-Ups: 8

 

34 (boys); 21 (girls) / 8 (boys); 3 (girls)

Below Norm for Push-ups and Pull Ups

Speed

40-Yard Dash

6.21 s

5.97 s (boys)

Below Norm

Cardiovascular  Endurance

One-Mile Run

Could not complete

6:57 min (boys);

 8:00 min (girls)

Below Norm

 

 

Table 2. Sample Athletic Profile Test Results for Post-PHV Youth

FITNESS ATTRIBUTE

EXERCISE/MOVEMENT

ATHLETE SCORE

POST-PHV NORMS (2)

ABOVE NORM, BELOW NORM, OR MEETS STANDARD

Fundamental Motor Skill Mastery

Fundamental Motor Skill Mastery Checklist (8)

Motor Skill Mastery except for static and dynamic balance

Meets standard (in combinations for sport skills)

Below norm for static and dynamic balance

Proper Athletic Stance

 

Meets standard

Meets standard

Meets standard

Body Awareness

 

Meets standard

Meets standard

Meets standard

Cardinal Planes of Motion

 

Meets standard

Meets standard

Meets standard

Exercise Technique (1)

Exercise Technique for Foundational Exercises as well as sportrelevant exercises

Exercise technique on power exercise (Clean)  is very poor. Core exercise performance is very good (training  age = 2). Accessory exercise performance also matches training age 2.

Meets Standard

 

Programming needs to be regressed for power exercises. All other exercises programmed at training age 2

Balance (static)

Stork Stand

43 s (boys)

31-40 in. (boys) 16-32 in. (girls)

Below Norm

Agility

Pro-Agility

5.19 s

5.02 s +/- 0.24 s

Below, especially for movements such as deceleration and reacceleration

Power (horizontal)

Standing Broad Jump

70 in. (boys)

 

79 in. (boys);

 65 in. (girls)

Below Norm

Power (vertical)

Vertical Jump

17.5 in. (boys)

20.5 in. (boys);

 15.5 in. (girls)

Slightly above norm

Strength (absolute)

Handgrip Dynamometer

45 kg

43.4 kg +/- 7.3 kg (17 y/o)

Below norm

Strength (relative)

Pull-Ups/Push-Ups

Pull-Ups: 5 (boys)/ Push-Ups: 27 (boys)

15 (boys); 2 (girls)/ 56 (boys); 28 (girls

Below norm for push-ups and pull ups

Speed

40-Yard Dash

5.00 s (boys)

5.97 s (boys)

Below norm

Cardiovascular  Endurance

One-mile run

6:10 (boys)

6:57 min (boys)

8:00 min (girls)

Below Norm

 

Commonalities and Differences in Program Design

Program design for pre- and post-PHV has the following similarities:

  • Programming is based on the needs analysis and test results
  • Fundamental movement skills need to always be taught and reinforced
  • Exercise technique should always be reviewed and corrected when necessary (during the growth spurt, for example)
  • Training age is always based on the experience of the athlete with each movement—chronological age is not the primary determinant of program design
  • Training needs to occur in all three planes of movement
  • While it seems that there are significant training differences, foundational strength and conditioning is often the correct approach for athletes of all ages and abilities. Sports practice differentiates sport-relevant and sport-centric movements, patterns, and strategies.

Program design for pre- and post-PHV has the following differences:

  • A group of aspiring athletes may vary in training age, level of maturity, and interest in the program. Movements need to be modified, progressed, and regressed as applicable.
  • Pre-PHV athletes still need to focus on development of movement, strength, and technique; post-PHV athletes need to also consider building on their strength capabilities as power.

As training age advances, program design also advances. Coaches need to be prepared with exercise progressions and regressions to adjust for athletes of different ages and abilities in the same group. 

“Strength and conditioning coaches can apply LTAD to help create a developmentally-appropriate strength and conditioning program for youth of varying ages, abilities, and interests.”

Tweet this quote

Conclusion

Strength and conditioning coaches can apply LTAD to help create a developmentally-appropriate strength and conditioning program for youth of varying ages, abilities, and interests. Regardless of training age, chronological age, or developmental age, all fitness attributes need to be continuously developed throughout childhood and adolescence (pillar 3, 6, and 9), while programming for specific deficits, as identified in the needs analysis and test results. Part 2 of this article is but one example of how LTAD can be utilized to develop a strength and conditioning program for pre-PHV and post-PHV youth. Factors including movement proficiency, fitness attribute test results, sports-relevant skill/ attribute test results, goals, and periodization phase need to be considered when designing training programs. 

This article originally appeared in NSCA Coach, a quarterly publication for NSCA Members that provides valuable takeaways for every level of strength and conditioning coach. You can find scientifically based articles specific to a wide variety of your athletes’ needs with Nutrition, Programming, and Youth columns. Read more articles from NSCA Coach »

Share:

References

1. Haff, G, and Triplett, T. Essentials of strength training and conditioning, 4th Ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2015.

2. Hoffman, J. Norms for fitness, performance, and health. Chicago: Human Kinetics, 2006.

3. Howard, R. Using LTAD to program for a middle school athlete and a high school athlete: Part 1 – Generating an athletic profile. NSCA Coach 4(2): 10-15, 2018.

4. Howard, R. The ABCs of long-term athletic development. NSCA Coach 5(2): 36-39, 2017.

5. Lloyd, R, Cronin, J, Faigenbaum, A, Haff, G, Howard, R, et al. National Strength and Conditioning Association position statement on long-term athletic development. Official position stand of the National Strength and Conditioning Association. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 30(6): 1491-1509, 2016.

About the author

Rick Howard, DSc, CSCS,*D, RSCC*E

Contact Rick Howard

Contact Rick Howard

Your first name is required.
Your last name is required.
Your email is required.
Your message is required.
Your reCaptcha is required.

Your email was successfully sent to Rick Howard

Rick Howard earned his doctorate in Health Promotion and Wellness from Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions. He is an Associate Professor i ...

View full biography
#NSCAStrong #NSCAStrong

has been added to your shopping cart!

Continue Shopping Checkout Now