by Lee Brown, PhD, CSCS, CSPS, TSAC-F, RSCC, Scott Caulfield, CSCS,*D, TSAC-F,*D, RSCC*E, Jim McDonald, CSCS, NSCA-CPT, TSAC-F, and Alexandra Cacioppo, MS, CSCS, TSAC-F, USAW-2
TSAC Report
November 2025
Vol 79, Issue 1
In the fire service, physical preparedness can mean the difference between life and death. Yet the role of a strength and conditioning professional, such as a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist® (CSCS®) or Tactical Strength and Conditioning Facilitator® (TSAC-F®), goes far beyond sets and repetitions (8). Success depends not only on improving performance, but also on understanding the organizational culture in which firefighters live and work. This article examines how coaching philosophy, grounded in adult learning theory and cultural intelligence, can bridge the communication gap between strength and conditioning professionals and firefighters. Drawing from interdisciplinary research, this article outlines a framework for improving relational dynamics, fostering mutual respect, and designing collaborative, context-specific training programs that enhance performance, organizational culture, and individual well-being.
Effective engagement with firefighters requires an appreciation of the service’s entrenched values, norms, and social hierarchies. This culture, steeped in camaraderie, duty, and legacy, can both support and resist change (4). The apprenticeship model, where senior members or officers serve as the “more knowledgeable other,” further reinforces uniformity and a wariness of external influence. Without cultural literacy, even well-designed programs can be dismissed as irrelevant. With it, strength and conditioning professionals can build credibility, foster trust, and secure the buy-in to drive meaningful change (4).
Without recognizing this cultural framework, fitness initiatives can be misinterpreted as outside interference or even a critique of the profession itself. This helps explain why many well-intentioned fitness programs struggle to take root. Firefighters may reject them, not because they do not value health, but because the delivery feels disconnected from their identity and lived reality. Fire service culture prizes resilience, operational readiness, and loyalty to peers. When fitness is framed only through the lens of athletic performance, it risks clashing with the firefighter’s self-concept as a protector and team member. Conversely, when strength and conditioning professionals align fitness with operational effectiveness, injury reduction, and shared responsibility to the crew, it resonates more deeply. Bridging this cultural gap requires strength and conditioning professionals to become translators—adapting their language and methods so that fitness is not seen as an “add-on,” but rather as an integral part of the firefighter’s mission.
The metaphor of the “empty cup and full plate” aptly describes the psychosocial burden carried by many firefighters; high external demands met with depleted internal resources. Data from Fahy and Petrillo indicate that 56% of firefighter fatalities in 2020 were attributed to stress and overexertion, with an additional 44% linked to cardiac incidents (3). Concurrently, reported injuries are on the rise, with most linked to preventable causes such as overexertion, slips, falls, and muscular strain during routine duties and training (2). These are not isolated incidents, they are results of cumulative stress (e.g., long shifts, disrupted sleep, and physically demanding tasks performed under pressure). For example, strains may occur when firefighters lift equipment without adequate recovery, or when fatigue from a previous night shift compromises movement quality.
These outcomes underscore the need for programming that not only enhances performance, but also restores physiological balance to reduce the risk of injury or illness. In practice, this means incorporating recovery strategies that account for disrupted circadian rhythms, fatigue management, and progressive load monitoring. Strength and conditioning professionals must assume most firefighters are never operating in a fully rested state. Programs should reflect that by emphasizing movement quality, functional strength, and injury resilience.
At the heart of effective coaching lies communication—not just cues and instruction, but trust-based conversations built on listening, empathy, and adaptability. For strength and conditioning professionals working with firefighters, this means recognizing that fatigue, tradition, and ego all influence how messages are received. Firefighters, like all adult learners, vary in motivation and learning style. As Murrell notes, both intrinsic and extrinsic drivers influence leadership and behavior in the fire service (12). A firefighter motivated by peer respect may respond differently to coaching than one driven by personal health. Understanding these drivers is key to engagement. With this awareness, strength and conditioning professionals can shift communication from a top-down model to one of shared commitment—where training is not an outside mandate but a team goal. This shift builds the bridge between coaching strategy and cultural integration.
Codevelopment of training protocols with firefighters enhances relevance, autonomy, and adherence. According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), incorporating firefighter feedback improves safety and effectiveness outcomes (10,13). Despite this, fewer than 30% of United States departments have formalized fitness programs, and most lack consistent organizational support from leadership (6). When leadership actively endorses and participates in strength and conditioning initiatives, cultural transformation becomes more feasible. Research confirms that leadership engagement is the most reliable predictor of program success and long-term sustainability (7,8).
A persistent barrier in tactical populations is the normalization of ego-driven training, the belief that more intensity equals better results. This mindset, often passed down through tradition, contributes to chronic injury, burnout, and poor health outcomes. Strength and conditioning professionals must push back against the “go hard or go home” ideology; not by confrontation, but through education and leadership. For example, maxing out lifts after a 24-hr shift is not toughness, it is a liability. Given the alarming prevalence of obesity in career firefighters—43% according to Kaipust et al.—there is a need to challenge these performance myths and prioritize training that supports both heroism and health (5).
The evolving demands of tactical strength and conditioning requires strength and conditioning professionals to stay current on research in physiology, organizational behavior, and communication. Integrating insights from sports psychology, adult learning, and leadership studies, strength and conditioning professionals are better equipped to serve this high-risk population. As the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) and others have noted, a multidisciplinary approach is critical to reduce injuries, optimize performance, and address the rising health care costs of the fire service (1).

Firefighters operate in one of the most physically- and psychologically-demanding professions. Yet many strength and conditioning programs fall short; not due to programming flaws, but because they do not align with the firehouse reality. When coaching feels out of touch with firefighter identity, it gets ignored and the result is poor buy-in, preventable injuries, and missed potential.
Improving outcomes in firefighter strength and conditioning takes more than technical expertise. It demands a philosophical shift that emphasizes cultural fluency, relational coaching, collaboration, and professional growth.
Key strategies proposed in this article include:
These are not just tips, they represent a reframing of the coach-firefighter relationship. Strength and conditioning professionals move from being service providers to trusted members of the mission. While insights here are drawn from practical experience and existing literature, further research is needed to measure long-term effects of these relational strategies. Still, the path forward is clear. In the end, advancing firefighter performance and resilience is not just a technical challenge, it is a human one. That transformation starts not in the gym, but in the relationship.
Integrating strength and conditioning into the fire service requires more than programming, it demands cultural awareness, clear communication, and true collaboration. Strength and conditioning professionals should:
Above all, strength and conditioning professionals must commit to continuous improvement, just like the tactical professionals they serve.
This article originally appeared in TSAC Report, the NSCA’s quarterly, online-only publication geared toward the training of tactical athletes, operators, and facilitators. It provides research-based articles, performance drills, and conditioning techniques for operational, tactical athletes. The TSAC Report is only available for NSCA Members. Read more articles from TSAC Report
Learn about the benefits of NSCA Membership »