Load Carriage – Programming for Special Operations Forces

by Taylor Givens, TSAC-F and Nicholas Martinez
TSAC Report April 2023
Vol 67, Issue 5

Share:

This narrative review will focus on the research related to tactical load carriage and on a program recommendation to maximize strength and endurance adaptations in Special Operations Forces (SOF).

Introduction

Special Operations Forces (SOF) require an advanced level of physical fitness to accomplish occupational tasks. When SOF are not in hostile combat zones, they are training various skills to increase operational readiness and task efficiency. Typical tasks associated with SOF training are rucking, marksmanship, obstacle courses, land/sea travel in gear, movement under fire, casualty drag, explosive movements (e.g., jumping, sprinting, lifting, throwing), and weapons/ammunition transferring (3,11). Most, if not all, of these tasks require the use of a rucksack or load carrying on the torso. These loads can range from 22 – 55 kg with the heavier loads being more prevalent (12,13). Research suggests that adding any amount of weight substantially decreases performance by an average of 1% per 1 kg and increases the likelihood of injury with loads 26 – 50% bodyweight (2,8,9,13,16).

Research analyzing maneuverability tasks with 16 kg or more of added load demonstrated notable decreases in agility and power, with a 13 – 27% decline in vertical jump scores compared to no load (9). During a 12-month deployment, 45% of United States combat forces suffered from a musculoskeletal injury related to load carriage and external variables (e.g., obstacles, terrain, occupational tasks) (8,13). Load carriage reduced endurance time and increased the energy expenditure of walking/running by 5 – 6% with altered gate kinematics and biomechanical responses (1,13). Loads carried on the extremities (e.g., boots, rifle) increases energy expenditure by an additional 7 – 10%/kg of weight added (1). There is no current “standard” for SOF fitness training as it applies to load carriage, which may be due to the varying missions, individual roles, and physiological differences. Although there are mixed recommendations on concurrent resistance and endurance training, research shows that it is the most effective method to optimize physical readiness in SOF (5,11,18). Further reinforcing resistance training with plyometrics and agility performance in task-simulated movement patterns could increase combat readiness (5). Regular exposure to complex occupational tasks with a range of loads could also improve performance (3). Therefore, this narrative review will focus on the research related to tactical load carriage and on a program recommendation to maximize strength and endurance adaptations in SOF.

This article originally appeared in TSAC Report, the NSCA’s quarterly, online-only publication geared toward the training of tactical athletes, operators, and facilitators. It provides research-based articles, performance drills, and conditioning techniques for operational, tactical athletes. The TSAC Report is only available for NSCA Members. Read more articles from TSAC Report 

Related Reading

Share:

References

  1. Boffey, D, Harat, I, Gepner, Y, Frosti, C, Funk, S, and Hoffman, J. The physiological and biomechanics of load carriage performance. Military Medicine 184, 2019.
  2. Dicks, N, and Pettitt, R. Optimization of the critical speed concept for tactical professionals: A brief review. Sports 9(106): 2021.
  3. Foulis, S, Redmond, J, Frykman, P, Warr, B, Zambraski, E, and Sharp, M. U.S. Army physical demands study: Reliability of simulations of physically demanding tasks performed by combat arms soldiers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning 31(12): 3245–3252, 2017.
  4. Haff, G, and Triplett, NT. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. (4th edition.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2016
  5. Heilbronn, B, Doma, K, Gormann, D, Schumann, M, and Sinclair, W. Effects of periodized vs. nonperiodized resistance training on Army-specific fitness and skills performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning 34(3): 738-753, 2019.
  6. Helgerud, J, Hoydal, K, Wang, E, Karlsen, T, Berg, P, Bjerkaas, M, et al. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 39(4): 665-671, 2007.
  7. Hernandez, L, Coffin, S, and Taylor, M. Greater fitness is associated with improved functional movement characteristics in explosive ordnance disposal technicians. Journal of Strength and Conditioning 1-7, 2020.
  8. Jaworski, R, Jensen, A, Niederberger, B, Congalton, R, and Kelly, K. Changes in combat task performance under increasing loads in active duty Marines. Military Medicine 180(3): 179, 2015.
  9. Joseph, A, Wiley, A, Orr, R, Schram, B, and Dawes, J. The impact of load carriage on measures of power and agility in tactical cccupations: A critical review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(88): 1-16, 2018.
  10. Krajewski, K, Bansbach, H, McLean, L, McKenzie, C, Rawcliffe, A, Graham, S, et al. Effects of short-term unilateral strength training on measures of postural control when wearing “operationally relevant” backpack loads. Journal of Strength and Conditioning 34(10): 2743-2750, 2020.
  11. Mala, J, Szivak, T, and Kraemer, W. Improving performance of heavy load carriage during high-intensity combat-related tasks. Journal of Strength and Conditioning 37(4): 2015.
  12. Maupin, D, Wills, T, Orr, R, and Schram, B. Fitness profiles in elite tactical units: A critical review. International Journal of Exercise Science 11(3): 1041-1062, 2018.
  13. Orr, R, Pope, R, Lopes, T, Leyk, D, Blacker, S, Bustillo-Aguirre, BS, and Knapik, JJ. Soldier load carriage, injuries, rehabilitation and physical conditioning: An international approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 4010, 2021.
  14. Orr, R, Pope, R, Johnston, V, and Coyle, J. Load carriage: Minimizing soldier injuries through physical conditioning - A narrative review. Journal of Military and Veterans’ Health 18(3): 31-38, 2010.
  15. Robson, S, and Thomas, M. Enhancing performance under stress: Stress inoculation training for battlefield airmen. RAND Corporation: 2014.
  16. Thomas, M, Pohi, M, Shapiro, R, Keeler, J, and Abel, M. Effect of load carriage on tactical performance in Special Weapons and Tactics operators. Journal of Strength and Conditioning 32(2): 554-564, 2017.
  17. Vaara, J, Groeller, H, Drain, J, Kyrolainen, H, Pihlainen, K, Ojanen, T, et al. Physical training considerations for optimizing performance in essential military tasks. European Journal of Sport Science 2021.
  18. Winters, J, Heebner, N, Johnson, A, Poploski, K, Royer, S, Nagal, T, et al. Altered physical performance following advanced special operations tactical training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning 35(7): 1809-1816, 2019.
About the author

Taylor Givens, CSCS, TSAC-F

Contact Taylor Givens

Contact Taylor Givens

Your first name is required.
Your last name is required.
Your email is required.
Your message is required.
Your reCaptcha is required.

Your email was successfully sent to Taylor Givens

View full biography
About the author

Nicholas Martinez

Contact Nicholas Martinez

Contact Nicholas Martinez

Your first name is required.
Your last name is required.
Your email is required.
Your message is required.
Your reCaptcha is required.

Your email was successfully sent to Nicholas Martinez

View full biography
#NSCAStrong #NSCAStrong

has been added to your shopping cart!

Continue Shopping Checkout Now